image

Justice Sodhi Committee Report on SEBI (Prohibition Of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992

The High Level Committee to Review the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992 constituted under the Chairmanship of Justice (Shri.) N.K. Sodhi, former chief justice of Karnataka and Kerala High Courts and former presiding officer of the Securities Appellate Tribunal, submitted its report to SEBI Chairman, Shri U.K. Sinha, on December 7, 2013 at Chandigarh.

The Committee has made a range of recommendations to the legal framework for prohibition of insider trading in India and has focused on making this area of regulation more predictable, precise and clear by suggesting a combination of principles-based regulations and rules that are backed by principles. The Committee has also suggested that each regulatory provision may be backed by a note on legislative intent.

Some of the salient features of the proposed regulations are set out below:-

1- While enlarging the definition of “insider”, the term connected person has been defined more clearly and immediate relatives are presumed to be connected persons, with a right to rebut the presumption.  The term immediate relative would cover close relatives who are either financially dependent or consult an insider in connection with trading in securities.

2- Insiders would be prohibited from communicating, providing or allowing access to UPSI unless required for discharge of duties or for compliance with law.

3- The regulations would bring greater clarity on what constitutes unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) by defining what constitutes generally available information (essentially, information to which non-discriminatory public access would be available). A list of types of information that may ordinarily be regarded as price sensitive information has also been provided.

 4- Trading in listed securities when in possession of UPSI would be prohibited except in certain situations provided in the regulations.

 5- Insiders who are liable to possess UPSI all round the year would have the option to formulate pre-scheduled trading plans. In such cases, the new UPSI that may come into their possession without having been with them when formulating the plan would not impede their ability to trade. Trading plans would, however, be required to be disclosed to the stock exchanges and have to be strictly adhered to.

 6- Conducting due diligence on listed companies would be permissible for purposes of transactions entailing an obligation to make an open offer under the Takeover Regulations. In all other cases, due diligence would be permissible subject to making the diligence findings that constitute UPSI generally available prior to the proposed trading.  In all cases, the board of directors would need to opine that permitting the conduct of due diligence is in the best interests of the company, and would also have to ensure execution of non-disclosure and non-dealing agreements.

 7- Trades by promoters, employees, directors and their immediate relatives would need to be disclosed internally to the company. Trades within a calendar quarter of a value beyond Rs. 10 lakhs or such other amount as SEBI may specify, would be required to be disclosed to the stock exchanges.

 8- Every entity that has issued securities which are listed on a stock exchange or which are intended to be so listed would be required to formulate and publish a Code of Fair Disclosure governing disclosure of events and circumstances that would impact price discovery of its securities.

 9- Every listed company and market intermediary is required to formulate a Code of Conduct to regulate, monitor and report trading in securities by its employees and other connected persons. All other persons such as auditors, law firms, accountancy firms, analysts, consultants etc. who handle UPSI in the course of business operations may formulate a code of conduct and the existence of such a code would evidence the seriousness with which the organization treats compliance requirements.

 10- Companies would be entitled to require third-party connected persons who are not employees to disclose their trading and holdings in securities of the company.

The Committee had its first sitting on April 12, 2013, and finalized the report at its last sitting on December 7, 2013. The report of the Committee is available on SEBI™s website (www.sebi.gov.in). SEBI invites public comments on the above report, which may be sent to comments_pit@sebi.gov.in so as to reach on or before December 31, 2013. Public comments may also be sent at the following address:-

            Legal Affairs Department

            Division of Policy

            Securities and Exchange Board of India

            C-4A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai 51

Comments are required to be sent in the following format:-

Sr. No. Details of the Organization/ Individual Draft Provision Recommended by the Committee Comment Rationale
1. Provide the name and other details of the organization / individual here Insert reference to paragraph number/ regulation number of the Committee™s Report Provide your comment here Specify your reasons / rationale for the comment 

Tags: Bandra Kurla ComplexChandigarhIndiaInsider TradingKarnatakaSecurities & Exchange Board of IndiaStock exchangeUPSI

profile image

About eMinds Legal

eMinds Legal

eMinds Legal is a Corporate Law Firm based in Gurgaon, India specializing in Corporate Legal, Corporate Secretarial and Compliance. The Firm comprises of a team of Corporate Lawyers and Company Secretaries with in-depth subject matter knowledge and participative industry experience of over 15 years.

Corporate Law Referencer

Recent Articles

Recent Legal updates

Recent Gst Updates