Class Action Suits Under Companies Act, 2013

The concept of Class Action Suits is among one of the many novelties introduced by the Companies Act, 2013. Thought the concept per se is not new but in Indian context it has found statutory recognition and enforceability now only by means of Companies Act 2013.

The first time class action suit came to the spotlight in the context of securities market was when the Satyam scam broke out in 2009. At that time, the Indian investors in India couldn’t take any legal recourse against the company while their counterparts in USA filed class action suit claiming damages from the company and the auditing firm.

Credit to the Satyam scam, India has introduced class action suit in the new Companies Act, 2013 by means of Section 245 which is yet to be notified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

In simple terms, a class action suit refers to a lawsuit that allows a large number of people with a common interest in a matter to sue or be sued as a group. It is a procedural device enabling one or more plaintiffs to file and prosecute a litigation on behalf of a larger group or class, wherein such class has common rights and grievances.

PROVISIONS RELATING TO CLASS ACTION SUIT AS CONTAINED IN COMPANIES ACT, 2013

Section 245 of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act) contains provisions regarding Class Action Suits which are discussed in detail below:

Who can file Class Action Suits?

As per Section 245 (1) read with Section 245 (3), a Class Action Suit may be filed by:

1. Member or members or any class of them, as described below

  • in the case of a company having a share capital,
    • any 100 or more members of the company, or members equal to or exceeding 10% of the total number of its members, whichever is less, or
    • any member or members singly or jointly holding atleast 10% of the issued share capital of the company,

subject to the condition that the applicant or applicants has or have paid all calls and other sums due on his or their shares

  • in the case of a company not having a share capital, members equal to or exceeding 1/5th of the total number of its members.

2. Depositor or depositors or any class of them, as described below

  • any 100 or more depositors of the company, or depositors equal to or exceeding 10% of the total number of its depositors, whichever is less, or
  • any depositor or depositors singly or jointly holding atleast 10% of the total value of outstanding deposits of the company.

3. The Central Government, if it is of the opinion that the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to public interest

  • Before which authority class action suit needs to be filed?
    • Application for class action suit has to be filed before the National Company Law Board Tribunal (NCLT/Tribunal).
  • When can a Class Action Suit be filed?
    • Members or depositors or any class of them, as indicated above, may file a class action suit if they are of the opinion that the management or conduct of the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the company or its members or depositors seeking all or any of the following orders, namely:”.

(a) to restrain the company from committing an act which is ultra vires the articles or memorandum of the company;

(b) to restrain the company from committing breach of any provision of the company™s memorandum or articles;

(c) to declare a resolution altering the memorandum or articles of the company as void if the resolution was passed by suppression of material facts or obtained by mis-statement to the members or depositors;

(d) to restrain the company and its directors from acting on such resolution;

(e) to restrain the company from doing an act which is contrary to the provisions of this Act or any other law for the time being in force;

(f) to restrain the company from taking action contrary to any resolution passed by the members;

(g) to claim damages or compensation or demand any other suitable action from or against”

(i) the company or its directors for any fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful act or omission or conduct or any likely act or omission or conduct on its or their part;

(ii) the auditor including audit firm of the company for any improper or misleading statement of particulars made in his audit report or for any fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful act or conduct; or

(iii) any expert or advisor or consultant or any other person for any incorrect or misleading statement made to the company or for any fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful act or conduct or any likely act or conduct on his part;

(h) to seek any other remedy as the Tribunal may deem fit.

  • Against whom a Class Action Suit can be filed?
    • Class action suit can be filed against the
      • Company,
      • Any of its directors
      • Auditor, including audit firm
      • Expert or advisor or consultant or any other person

In case of any claim against an audit firm, the liability shall be of the firm as well as of each partner who was involved in making any improper or misleading statement of particulars in the audit report or who acted in a fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful manner

  • What action will be taken by NCLT on a class action suit application?
    • On receipt of a class action suit application, the Tribunal will look into the following before admitting it:
      • whether the member or depositor is acting in good faith in making the application for seeking an order;
      • any evidence before it as to the involvement of any person other than directors or officers of the company on any of the matters on which an order can be passed;
      • whether the cause of action is one which the member or depositor could pursue in his own right rather than through an order under this section;
      • any evidence before it as to the views of the members or depositors of the company who have no personal interest, direct or indirect, in the matter being proceeded under this section;
      • where the cause of action is an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would likely to be”
        • authorised by the company before it occurs; or
        • ratified by the company after it occurs;
        • where the cause of action is an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company.
  • If the application is admitted, the Tribunal will
    • Issue a public notice to all the members of the class by publishing the same within 7 days of admission of the application once in a vernacular newspaper in the principal vernacular language of the state in which the registered office of the company is situated and circulating in that state and at least once in English in an English newspaper circulating in that State.
    • Require the company to place the public notice on the website of such company, if any, in addition to publication of such public notice in newspaper and such notice shall also  be placed on the website of the Tribunal, if any, on the website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs, on the website, if any, of the concerned Registrar of Companies and in respect of a listed company on the website of the concerned stock exchange(s) where the company has any of its securities listed, until the application is disposed of by the Tribunal.
    • Consolidate all similar applications prevalent in any jurisdiction into a single application and the class members or depositors shall be allowed to choose the lead applicant and in the event the members or depositors of the class are unable to come to a consensus, the Tribunal shall have the power to appoint a lead applicant, who shall be in charge of the proceedings from the applicant™s side
    • Not allow two class action applications for the same cause of action.
    • A copy of every application made under this section shall be served on the Regional Director and Registrar of Companies.
    • The Tribunal shall give notice of every application made to it under this section to the Central Government and shall take into consideration the representations, if any, made to it by that Government before passing a final order under those sections.
    • Where any application filed before the Tribunal is found to be frivolous or vexatious, it shall, for reasons to be recorded in writing, reject the application and make an order that the applicant shall pay to the opposite party such cost, not exceeding Rs. 1 Lakh, as may be specified in the order.
  • Penalty for non-compliance of order passed by Tribunal

Any company which fails to comply with an order passed by the Tribunal under section 245 shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than Rs. 5 Lakhs but which may extend to Rs. 25 Lakhs and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 3 years and with fine which shall not be less than Rs. 25,000/- but which may extend to Rs. 1,00,000/-.

Under Section 425 of the Companies Act, 2013 the Tribunal has also been conferred the same jurisdiction, powers and authority in respect of contempt of its orders as conferred on High Court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

  • Other points relating to Class Action Suits
    • The cost or expenses connected with the publication of the public notice shall be borne by the applicant and shall be defrayed by the company or any other person responsible for any oppressive act.
    • Any order passed by the Tribunal shall be binding on the company and all its members, depositors and auditor including audit firm or expert or consultant or advisor or any other person associated with the company.
    • Provisions relating to class action suits do not apply to a banking company.
  • Difference between application for prevention of oppression and mismanagement u/s 241 to 244 and Class Action Suits u/s 245

Prevention of oppression and mismanagement u/s 241 to 244

Class Action Suits U/s 245

Who can file application?

Members of the Company

Members as well as deposit holders of the company

Against whom application can be filed?

Company and its statutory appointees

Company,

Any of its directors

Auditor, including audit firm

Expert or advisor or consultant or any other person

 

Matters for which application can be filed

Any current or past activity or to prevent recurrence

Any current, past or future activity, including to desist from one or more particular action that have not been taken yet.

Tags: Central GovernmentClass actionCompanies ActCompanies Act 2013IndiaLawsuitMinistry of Corporate AffairsSatyam

profile image

About Dhanapal Sreepathi

Dhanapal Sreepathi | Managing Partner

A Practising Company Secretary by profession, practising in Chennai, Managing Partner of M/s S Dhanapal & Associates, a firm of Practising Company Secretaries in Chennai. He is a graduate in commerce, law and an Associate Member of The Institute of Company Secretaries of India. He is also a visiting Faculty of The Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI), Chennai. A passionate writer on legal and secretarial matters in Chartered Accountant Study Circle Journals and ICSI Journals, can be reached at csdhanapal@gmail.com, blog space is www.corporatelegalclub.blogspot.com.

Comments

  1. Prashant says:

    Good write-up. Comparison table at the end of the article is especially informative.

  2. Prashant says:

    An article on chapter III of the Act, 2013 would be simply great given the fact that most of the sections of chapter III are already notified and are in play. Thanks.

Corporate Law Referencer

Recent Articles

Recent Legal updates

Recent Gst Updates