image

Identification of ‘beneficial ownership’ under PMLA

RBI/2012-13/385
DBOD.AML.BC. No.71/14.01.001/2012-13

January 18, 2013

The Chairmen/CEOs of all Scheduled Commercial Banks
(Excluding RRBs)/Local Area Banks /All India Financial Institutions

Dear Sir,

Know Your Customer (KYC) norms /Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Standards/Combating of Financing of Terrorism (CFT)/Obligation of banks under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002

Please refer to paragraph 2.4 (a) of Master Circular DBOD.AML.BC. No.11/14.01.001/2012-13 dated July 02, 2012 on Know Your Customer (KYC) norms / Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Standards/Combating of Financing of Terrorism (CFT)/Obligation of banks under PMLA, 2002.

2. Rule 9(1A) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Rules, 2005 requires that every banking company, and financial institution, as the case may be, shall identify the beneficial owner and take all reasonable steps to verify his identity. The term “beneficial owner” has been defined as the natural person who ultimately owns or controls a client and/or the person on whose behalf the transaction is being conducted, and includes a person who exercises ultimate effective control over a juridical person. Government of India has since examined the issue and has specified the procedure for determination of Beneficial Ownership. The procedure as advised by the Government of India is as under:

A. Where the client is a person other than an individual or trust, the banking company and financial institution, as the case may be, shall identify the beneficial owners of the client and take reasonable measures to verify the identity of such persons, through the following information:

  1. The identity of the natural person, who, whether acting alone or together, or through one or more juridical person, exercises control through ownership or who ultimately has a controlling ownership interest.

    Explanation: Controlling ownership interest means ownership of/entitlement to more than 25 percent of shares or capital or profits of the juridical person, where the juridical person is a company; ownership of/entitlement to more than 15% of the capital or profits of the juridical person where the juridical person is a partnership; or, ownership of/entitlement to more than 15% of the property or capital or profits of the juridical person where the juridical person is an unincorporated association or body of individuals.
  2. In cases where there exists doubt under (i) as to whether the person with the controlling ownership interest is the beneficial owner or where no natural person exerts control through ownership interests, the identity of the natural person exercising control over the juridical person through other means. 

    Explanation: Control through other means can be exercised through voting rights, agreement, arrangements, etc.

  3. Where no natural person is identified under (i) or (ii) above, the identity of the relevant natural person who holds the position of senior managing official.

B. Where the client is a trust, the banking company and financial institution, as the case may be, shall identify the beneficial owners of the client and take reasonable measures to verify the identity of such persons, through the identity of the settler of the trust, the trustee, the protector, the beneficiaries with 15% or more interest in the trust and any other natural person exercising ultimate effective control over the trust through a chain of control or ownership.

C. Where the client or the owner of the controlling interest is a company listed on a stock exchange, or is a majority-owned subsidiary of such a company, it is not necessary to identify and verify the identity of any shareholder or beneficial owner of such companies.

3. Banks may review their KYC policy in the light of the above instructions and ensure strict adherence to the same.

Yours faithfully,

(Sudha Damodar)
Chief General Manager

profile image

About eMinds Legal

eMinds Legal

eMinds Legal is a Corporate Law Firm based in Gurgaon, India specializing in Corporate Legal, Corporate Secretarial and Compliance. The Firm comprises of a team of Corporate Lawyers and Company Secretaries with in-depth subject matter knowledge and participative industry experience of over 15 years.

6 responses to “Identification of ‘beneficial ownership’ under PMLA”

  1. Shakima says:

    Hey there, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues.
    When I look at your blog site in Safari, it
    looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping.
    I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
    Other then that, great blog!

  2. Keelan says:

    After going over a handful of the blog posts on your blog, I seriously appreciate your technique of writing a blog. I added it to my bookmark webpage list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my web site as well and let me know what you think.

  3. Duwayne says:

    Paragraph writing is also a excitement, if you be familiar with then you can write if
    not it is difficult to write.

  4. Gennaro says:

    I have been surfing on-line greater than three hours today, but I never discovered
    any interesting article like yours. It’s lovely value enough for me.
    Personally, if all webmasters and bloggers made excellent content material as
    you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.

  5. Cadie says:

    Greetings! Very helpful advice within this post! It’s the little changes that make the most significant changes. Many thanks for sharing!

  6. Inge Timm says:

    To the corporatelawreporter.com webmaster, Your posts are always well-supported by research and data.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Corporate Law Referencer

Corporate Law Referencer

Corporate Law Referencer

India’s Leading Compliance Software

India’s Leading Compliance Software

Get A Demo Today !

Recent Articles

Recent Legal updates

Recent Gst Updates