CLR Editorial Note: The assessee, in this case, had set up two windmills, the income from which was eligible for deduction u/s 80 IA. The assessee suffered losses in the Wind Mills and claimed a set-off on the same against its other income.
The Assessing Officer and subsequently the CIT(A), rejected the claim by relying on Gold Mine Shares 113 ITD 209 (SB) (Ahd) where it was held that in view of section 80-IA(5), the losses suffered by the eligible unit cannot be set off against the profits of other units or other businesses in the initial year of assessment or subsequent years of eligible years of assessments.
The Tribunal had to consider the following legal issues:
(i) what is the initial assessment year?,
(ii) whether the loss/ depreciation from the eligible unit is entitled to be set-off against the other income?,
(iii) whether the said loss/ depreciation of the eligible unit is, after set-off against the other income, still required to be notionally carried forward for set-off against the future profits of the eligible unit?
The Tribunal held in its decision that there is in fact no failure on the part of the taxpayer to fulfill the requisite conditions stated above, for claiming set-off of brought-forward business losses and un-absorbed depreciation in the year under consideration.
(i) The initial assessment year is the year in which the eligible unit commences operations. It is not the year in which the assessee chooses to claim deduction. The requirement of s. 80-IA(5) is that the loss and unabsorbed depreciation of the eligible unit should begin to be aggregated from the initial assessment year to the last allowable year. The aggregation has to continue for every year irrespective of whether s. 80-IA (1) deduction for that year is exigible or not;
(ii) If the eligible unit has no profit, the loss & depreciation of the eligible unit is entitled to be set-off against the other income. However, despite such set-off, the loss and depreciation has to be aggregated and notionally carried forward for set-off against the future profits of the eligible unit.
—————————————————————————-
The Full Case Document is available for download
—————————————————————————-
Main Case File :
- Case File – Hercules Hoists Limited vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Reference Cases:
- Case File – Acit vs Goldmine Shares And Finance Pvt. … on 30 April, 2008
