MCA working towards Lifting the Corporate Veil on Complex Structuring

The ministry of corporate affairs is working on a set of measures to lift the veil on the complex ways in which certain companies structure themselves, taking advantage of loopholes in the law, for protecting the interests of the shareholders.

Sources said that one of the first reform measure on which the MCA is working on is related to the way preference shares are used. Officials said that the ministry has woken up to the need because certain instances have come up that indicate how preferential shares could become a route for invisible promoters to dictate terms to the company, especially when it operates in sensitive sectors like telecom and defence.

The issue is a little complex, as was revealed with the Comptroller and Auditor General report that concluded Anil Ambani™s Reliance Telecom Ltd (RTL) had more than the permissible 10% stake in Swan Telecom when the latter applied for telecom licences in March 2007. However, RTL said that its equity was 9.9% and the balance was through preference shares, which cannot be counted as equity.

However, the CAG pointed out that preference shares were counted as equity in this case because R1,002 crore of Swan™s R1,100 crore equity had been contributed by RTL. The MCA feels that such instances could be tricky in future and, therefore, a clear policy should be put in place to bring more clarity on the ways preference shares can be used. For instance, it feels that a mechanism needs to be evolved wherein majority preferential shareholders be made directly responsible for the affairs of the company and ways devised to link preferential shareholding in such cases with equity shareholding for the purposes of calculating the equity holding. There is little doubt that Indian companies are misusing the preferential share route. It has become a tool for invisible promoters to control a company. We could be starting work to determine how this impacts shareholder democracy, an official said. Officials said that the ministry has for long been concerned about the myriad financial instruments usually adopted by companies. It™s a thought that we should govern preferential shares more strictly. We could either lay down stricter regulations or create more transparency, the source added. Experts and analysts have welcomed such a move, saying is was long overdue. Executive director and head (accounting advisory services) at KPMG Jamil Khatri said, Given the complex nature of financial instruments, classification as equity merely based on legal form may no longer be appropriate. He said that the government should draw up a set of strict guidelines that would clearly specify the factors that will determine whether a preference share is to be treated as equity or not. A Delhi-based corporate lawyer said that the government can also consider coming up with a fixed ratio between the preferential share allotted to a single entity and the total value of the company.

For instance, if the total value of the company is R1,000 crore and an individual entity holds preferential shares worth, say, R800 crore, then it cannot be merely seen as an investor, he said, requesting anonymity owing to the sensitivity of the matter. The managing director of Delhi-based Corporate Professionals Capital, Pavan K Vijay recommended a three-pronged strategy to address the issue of invisible promoters. MCA should direct companies to clearly state that who is controlling the company as in who is signing the cheques, making decisions and clearly spell out the equity structure of a company. Any attempt to violate these rules should become a criminal offence, he said. According to current rules, preferential shareholders can get voting rights under extraordinary circumstances, for instance, if a company has not paid dividend for a period of three years. MCA should seriously consider not giving complete voting rights to preferential shareholders but give qualifying voting rights which would have riders and restrictions, he said. Khatri said that the government should also make a distinction between the various types of preferential shares.

Source: FE

profile image

About eMinds Legal

eMinds Legal

eMinds Legal is a Corporate Law Firm based in Gurgaon, India specializing in Corporate Legal, Corporate Secretarial and Compliance. The Firm comprises of a team of Corporate Lawyers and Company Secretaries with in-depth subject matter knowledge and participative industry experience of over 15 years.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

India’s Leading Compliance Software

India’s Leading Compliance Software

Get A Demo Today !

Corporate Law Referencer

Corporate Law Referencer

Corporate Law Referencer

Recent Articles

Recent Legal updates

Recent Gst Updates